T.C SUPREME COURT 16.Legal Department, Base Number: 2016/ 14588 Decision: 2020 / 488 Decision Date: 17.02.2020
THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE: COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
As a result of the case between the parties, it was dec that the decision given by the Supreme Court be examined; It was understood that the appeal request was in due course, the examination report and the documents in the file were read, DISCUSSED AS NECESSARY:
As a result of the cadastre, 101 islands 12, 102 islands 1, 5, 21, 103 islands 7, 105 islands 2, 7 and 106 islands 77 parcels numbered 101 islands 12, 102 islands 1, 7, 105 islands 77 parcels located in the working area of the village …,…,… 16.386,18 square meters of real estate,
due to the existence of a lucrative statute of limitations, some of them have been identified and registered on behalf of the muris of the defendants, some of which are detached and some of which are shared. The plaintiff, the Treasury, filed a lawsuit on behalf of the defendant with a request to cancel the title deed registration of disputed real estate and register it on behalf of the Treasury, arguing that the real estate identified and registered from the document is more than 100 acres. At the end of the trial held by the court, it was decided to dismiss the case; the decision was appealed by the plaintiff’s deputy Treasury.
According to the contents of the file, the evidence on which the decision is based, the reasons that are required by the law, the absence of an error in the discretion of the evidence, the APPROVAL of the provision that is in accordance with the procedure and the law by rejecting appeals that are not in place, the Treasury is exempt from the fee, there is no place for the receipt of the fee,
it was decided unanimously on 17.02.2020, with the way to correct the decision being open within 15 days from the notification of the decision when the legal conditions were realized.
