THAT THE CASE HAS BEEN FILED AS AN INDEFINITE RECEIVABLE CASE – THAT THE PLAINTIFF CANNOT CHANGE THE TYPE OF CASE AND THEREFORE THE RESULT OF THE CLAIM BY MEANS OF PARTIAL RECTIFICATION – THAT HE CAN ONLY DO THIS BY FULLY RECTIFYING HIS CASE

T.C. SUPREME COURT 22.law office Base: 2015/10805 Decision: 2016/17961 Date of Decision: 16.06.2016 CASE OF WORKERS’ RECEIVABLES – THE CASE…

Okumaya Devam Et →

DUE TO THE NEED TO DETERMINE THE AMOUNT OF RECEIVABLES THAT CAN BE REQUESTED FROM THE HEIRS BY DEDUCTING THE COLLECTIONS MADE BY THE PLAINTIFF BANK IN THE NON-LAWSUIT PROCEEDINGS MENTIONED IN THE PETITIONS

T.C. SUPREME COURT 19.law office Base 2015/18400 Decision: 2016/10603 Date of Decision: 14.06.2016 CASE OF CANCELLATION OF THE APPEAL –…

Okumaya Devam Et →