THE ACCUSED DID NOT HAVE ANY ACTIONS THAT WOULD CONSTITUTE CHEATING – THE WRONGFUL PAYMENT MADE BY THE INSTITUTION WAS REIMBURSED BY THE DEFENDANTS TOGETHER WITH THEIR INTEREST – THE ELEMENTS OF THE CHARGED CRIME WERE NOT FORMED

Yorum bırakın

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT   23.Criminal Department Base: 2015/11475 Decision: 2016/5775 Date of Decision: 04.05.2016 QUALIFIED FRAUD…

Okumaya Devam Et →

IF THERE IS REAL ESTATE BELONGING TO THE DECEASED, THE LAND REGISTRY AND THE BASIS DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE BROUGHT AND IT SHOULD BE DETERMINED WHO THE HEIRS OF THE DECEASED ARE ACTUALLY

Yorum bırakın

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 14.law office Base: 2015/12867 Decision: 2016/2952 Date of Decision: 08.03.2016 CASE OF CANCELLATION…

Okumaya Devam Et →

THE INADMISSIBILITY OF DECIDING ON THE CONVICTION OF THE ACCUSED WITHOUT REGARD TO THE FACT THAT HIS ACT FALLS WITHIN THE SCOPE OF USELESS FORGERY AND DOES NOT OCCUR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LEGAL ELEMENTS OF THE BREAKTHROUGH CRIME

18/11/2021 Yorum bırakın

T.C. SUPREME COURT DECISION 21.Criminal Department Base: 2015/5637 Decision: 2016/1463 Date of Decision: 18.02.2016 FORGERY OFFENCE – THE INADMISSIBILITY OF…

Okumaya Devam Et →