DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE FEE AND POWER OF ATTORNEY IN CASES MUST BE RULED AS A VICTIM IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINIMUM WAGE TARIFF OF THE LAWYER – THE DECISION THAT THE BANKRUPTCY COURT IS HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE RELATIVE POWER OF ATTORNEY.

Yorum bırakın

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 15.law office Issue: 2015/4549 Decision: 2016/3863 Date of Decision: 14.07.2016 CASE OF COLLECTION…

Okumaya Devam Et →

AFTER EXPRESSING AN OPINION ON THE REJECTION OF THE REQUEST BY THE REJECTED JUDGE, THE DECISION WAS MADE BY THE AUTHORITY EXAMINING THE FILE TO REJECT THE REJECTION REQUEST AND PUNISH THE DEFENDANT WITH A DISCIPLINARY FINE

Yorum bırakın

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 20.law office Main: 2016/8400 Decision: 2016/7557 Date of Decision: 13.07.2016 COMPENSATION CASE –…

Okumaya Devam Et →

A DECISION ON THE NEED TO DECIDE WHETHER THE PROVISIONS OF THE POSTPONEMENT SHOULD BE APPLIED BY DISCUSSING THE CONDITIONS IN SUCH A WAY AS TO ALLOW SUPERVISION – THE CHILD WHO HAS BEEN DRAGGED INTO A CRIME DOES NOT HAVE A CRIMINAL RECORD PREVENTING THE POSTPONEMENT

Yorum bırakın

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 3.Criminal Department Based on: 2015/34296 Decision: 2016/15146 Date of Decision: 28.06.2016 INJURY OFFENCE…

Okumaya Devam Et →