2. Legal Department 2016/14468 B. , 2017/443 D
“text of jurisprudence”
COURT OF First Instance (Family) Court
TYPE OF CASE : Mutual Divorce
The judgment given by the local court at the end of the reasoning of the case between the parties, the date and number shown above, was appealed by the defendant-counter plaintiff woman in terms of rejection of her counterclaim, defect determination, custody and compensation; and by the plaintiff-counter defendant man in terms of non-appreciation of the proxy fee in favor of dec rejection of the counterclaimate by participation, the paperwork was read and discussed and considered as necessary:
1-According to the articles in the file, the evidence on which the decision is based, the reasons in accordance with the law, and in particular, there is no inaccuracy in the discretion of the evidence, the appeals of the defendant-counter plaintiff woman are inappropriate.
2-the plaintiff-upon the adoption of man’s case against the defendant, the defendant-plaintiff in the case where the decision is made against denial of her trial, the men decided in favor of the minimum wage law in the history of the attorney’s fee in accordance with the tariff separately for each case while the case, represented by the proxy itself in situations in which the plaintiff-the defendant for the benefit of men against a single hukmolunmas on retainer is against the law and procedures, and it has required me to break.
CONCLUSION: The above-mentioned provision of the appeal (2.) for the reason shown in the subparagraph, the other parts of the appeal subject to DETERIORATION, which are outside the scope of the violation, are listed above (1.) to be APPROVED for the reason shown in the paragraph, to upload the appeal notice fee written below to the appellant Nilgün, to deduct the advance fee of 143.50 TL. since the appeal application fee was received in advance, there was no room for other fees to be charged, the appeal advance fee was returned to the depositing Brigade on request, it was unanimously decided that within 15 days from the notification of this decision, the way to correct the decision would be open.19.01.2017 (Thurs.)
You can reach our other articles, sample decisions and petitions by clicking here.
