FIRST OF ALL, THE COURT SHOULD EXAMINE AND EVALUATE ALL THE REASONS FOR THE DISMISSAL THAT THE DEFENDANTS HAVE REPORTED, INCLUDING THE TRIAL STAGE, AND MAKE A DECISION BASED ON THE RESULT

23/02/2022 Yorum bırakın

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 13.law office Base: 2015/7350 Decision: 2015/31650 Date of Decision: 03.11.2015 CASE OF RECEIVABLES…

Okumaya Devam Et →

THE COURT’S DECISION THAT THE REFUSAL OF THE CASE IN TERMS OF THE POWER OF ATTORNEY FEE RELATED TO THE FILE OF THE ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE IS CONTRARY TO THE PROCEDURE AND THE LAW DUE TO THE NEED TO OBTAIN A REPORT FROM AN EXPERT WITNESS, TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THAT THE PLAINTIFF HAS BEEN UNFAIRLY DISMISSED

Yorum bırakın

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 13.law office Base: 2015/2853 Decision: 2016/7239 Date of Decision: 08.03.2016 CASE OF RECEIVABLES…

Okumaya Devam Et →

THE DECISION ON WHETHER TO OBTAIN A DETAILED EXPERT REPORT BASED ON THE AUDIT OF THE PARTIES AND THE JUDICIARY IN TERMS OF THE PARTIES’ REQUESTS IN ORDER TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE PARTIES ARE CREDITORS OF EACH OTHER BETWEEN THE PREVIOUS PERIOD AND THE CONTRACTUAL PERIOD

22/02/2022 Yorum bırakın

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 13.law office Base: 2015/37944 Decision: 2015/34696 Date of Decision: 30.11.2015 THE CASE OF…

Okumaya Devam Et →

THE DECISION IS BASED ON THE EVIDENCE ON WHICH THE DECISION IS BASED AND THERE IS NO INACCURACY IN THE DISCRETION OF THE EVIDENCE – THE DECISION THAT THE APPEALS ARE NOT IN PLACE

Yorum bırakın

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 16.law office Base: 2015/5675 Decision: 2015/13516 Date of Decision: 17.11.2015 CASE OF CANCELLATION…

Okumaya Devam Et →