THE DECISION ON THE REFUSAL OF THE CLAIMANT FOR MATERIAL COMPENSATION DUE TO THE REFUSAL OF THE WAIVER OF THE WAIVER ABOUT THE INSURANCE COMPANY TO THE DEFENDANT AND THE NEED NOT TO JUDGE THE COSTS OF PROCEEDINGS AGAINST HIM AND THE POWER OF ATTORNEY DUE TO THE WAIVER.

Yorum bırakın

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 17.law office Base: 2014/15380 Decision: 2014/13064 Date of Decision: 30.09.2014 COMPENSATION CASE –…

Okumaya Devam Et →

THE DECISION THAT THE INSTITUTION’S RECOURSE SHOULD BE DETERMINED AS A RESULT OF COMPARING THE AMOUNT OF THE FIRST ADVANCE CAPITAL-VALUED INCOME BY CALCULATING THE ACTUAL AMOUNTS OF LOSSES

Yorum bırakın

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 10.law office Base: 2014/741 Decision: 2014/26102 Date of Decision: 09.12.2014 COMPENSATION CASE –…

Okumaya Devam Et →

A DECISION ON THE NEED TO RECOGNIZE THAT THE DEFENDANTS ARE STAKEHOLDERS WITH A ONE–THIRD STAKE IN THE REAL ESTATE SUBJECT TO LITIGATION – THE PLAINTIFF GIVES MONEY TO THE DEFENDANTS SEPARATELY FOR THEIR SHARES – THE DEFENDANTS CANNOT BE HELD JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY LIABLE FOR THE TOTAL AMOUNT GIVEN BY THE PLAINTIFF.

01/03/2022 Yorum bırakın

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 3.law office Base: 2013/9856 Decision: 2013/12617 Date of Decision: 12.09.2013 CLAIM FOR RECEIVABLES…

Okumaya Devam Et →