IN A CLEAR AND INCOMPREHENSIBLE STATEMENT, BASED ON THE AMOUNTS SPECIFIED FROM EACH DEFENDANT’S POINT OF VIEW, IT IS INCORRECT TO ESTABLISH A PROVISION IN THE FORM OF JOINT RECEIPT FROM THE DEFENDANTS AND DELIVERY TO THE PLAINTIFF

29/10/2021 Yorum bırakın

11.law office Base: 2016/4219 Decision: 2016/6890 Date of Decision: 22.06.2016 A REQUEST TO COLLECT CORPORATE DAMAGES – IN THE FORM…

Okumaya Devam Et →

IN ORDER FOR AN APPEAL REVIEW TO BE CONDUCTED, THE VALUE OF THE GOODS OR RIGHTS THAT THE DECISION OF THE EXECUTIVE COURT JUL WILL NOT EXCEED THE SPECIFIED AMOUNT – THE VALUE OF THE OFFENDING GOODS REMAINS BELOW THE APPEAL LIMIT

Yorum bırakın

T.C. SUPREME COURT 8.law office Base: 2016/10162 Decision: 2016/10473 Date of Decision: 14.06.2016 THE CASE ARISING FROM FORECLOSURE – THE…

Okumaya Devam Et →

IN ORDER FOR THE FOLLOW-UP OF RECOVERY CASES TO BE CARRIED OUT IN ORDER FOR THE APPEAL REVIEW TO BE MADE IN THE ABETEMENT DECISIONS, THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY OR THE RIGHT THAT THE DECISION OF THE EXECUTIVE COURT CARRIES OUT MUST EXCEED THE SPECIFIED AMOUNT

Yorum bırakın

T.C. SUPREME COURT 8.law office Base: 2016/9690 Decision: 2016/10437 Date of Decision: 14.06.2016 FORTIFICATION CASE – THE REQUIREMENT THAT THE…

Okumaya Devam Et →